The Dukan Diet has been gaining popularity since it's recent release in the USA and the folks at Atkins aren't happy.
They recently sent out a press release including the following statement.
"The Atkins Diet remains the only low-carbohydrate weight loss approach scientifically validated as safe and effective."They go on to justify why Atkins is far superior to The Dukan Diet.
Atkins has been heavily marketing their New Atkins Diet this year which focuses more on nutrition and is less restrictive than their previous version.
The Dukan Diet was originally developed in France 10 years ago, but has recently been released in English for the UK market and just this month became available in the USA.
So why does The Dukan Diet have the folks at Atkins shaking in their boots? Will it really challenge the low carb king? Participate in the poll or comments below.
Which diet plan do you think is better?
The New Atkins Diet The Dukan Diet View results Diets Low Carb Atkins ElsewhereWorst Fast Food of 2010 (That's Fit)Senior 15 May Be More Accurate Than Freshman 15 (DailySpark)7 Surprising Secrets of Successful Weight Loss (Diet Blog)Video Exposes Horrible Conditions at Embattled Egg Farm (Diet Blog) 10 Comments Pater Rolf Hermann Lingen on 22 Dec 2010Better?
Both "diets" are unhealthy. This fact is known and proven, and therefore these "diets" should better be called "ideologies".
Just eat healthy (you know: whole grain carbs, polyunsaturated fat, essential proteins), and simply control / cut your calorie intake.
To me, they are both a little on the extreme side--I don't think restricting your carb intake that much is a great idea, especially if you are active. Just focus on eating real foods, lots of fruits and veggies, and avoid processed foods. It doesn't have to be complicated.
Reply ArrowSmith on 22 Dec 2010The key word is ACTIVE.
Reply Dennis Blair Fort Collins Personal Trainer on 22 Dec 2010I agree with both Pater and Spectra. They are extreme diets. No one is going to continue these diets for their entire life. That is why these fad diets fail time and time again. I wish people would stop being so gullible.
Reply Monique on 22 Dec 2010The previous comments do not reflect everyone's opinion - certainly not mine.
As someone who needs to keep blood sugar down (because it has started to become too high), I eat low carb and I'm healthier because of it. There is no "one size fits all", in diet or anything else.
If you do low carb properly and get your carbs from a variety of healthy veggies, you can follow Atkins (which I follow) and benefit! It's also true that the human diet has always included fat - but we have recently demonized it. By all factors, human health in places like North America - which has promoted low fat and eating more carbs - has worsened, from higher rates of illnesses like diabetes to rampaging rates of obesity.
As for it being a known fact that both of these diets are unhealthy, this deduction can't be based on the same research I've been reading. Even Oprah and Dr Oz will tell you that if you want to lose weight, you need to lower your carbs and increase your protein. The fact that these same people don't advocate a really low carb option makes sense - they are pitching to the masses (who may or may not need a really low carb approach.)
However, the basic science remains - low calorie diets (that don't decrease carbs and increase protein and/or include fat) don't work for the long term because deprivation doesn't work long term. Also, without enough fat there is no "satiation" which results in problems with maintaining a diet. Low carb can and does work long term - there is satisfaction in the food and I stay full from one meal to the next. It's even healthy, as long as you don't think Atkins means eating bacon all day. (If you read Atkins' book - even from the earlier editions - you'll see that he never meant that.)
No matter the diet, you still have to get actual nutrition. Any "diet" based on processed foods and junk will never work in the long term - even if it's low calorie.
Reply Dan on 22 Dec 2010I think it is absurd to blame genuine low fat diets for obesity and diabetes. All research states that a plant based low fat diet reverses diabetes, cancer and heart disease, and obesity. On the other hand, even the Inuit, who follow a natural Atkins like
diet, have been found to have hardening of the arteries, even prior to western influences. And actually it was Loren Cordain of the Paleo diet who stated this of the Inuit, not Dean Ornish. The problem was that many people ate more refined carbs in place of fat in their diet- Dean Ornish advocates complex carbs instead.
The problem with low-fat diets are that they're usually high-carb also... you can lose weight on them through calorie restriction, but your overall health might not get any better. And in the long run you reach a point where you can't restrict your calories anymore.
Reply Dan on 23 Dec 2010I think the common problem with low fat was that people were eating a lot of processed low fat foods, such as low fat ice cream, low fat candy and the like. A Vegan diet can be naturally low fat, since beans have a lot less fat than does meat- very few people were actually following a genuine non processed low fat diet. My non trained but inquiring mind about nutrition is that LOWER Carb or LOWER fat diets can be beneficial. I have read reports of benefits of LOWER carb diets where Carbs are lowered to perhaps 40% of calories which would be about 200 grams on a 2000 calorie diet. This kind of diet would help Monique. However, I don't think a ketogenic diet where Carbs are lowered to about 20 grams a day is that healthy, since carbs are the main fuel for the brain and for muscles. Of course refined carbs should be limited. Likewise, I might lower fat intake, but not severely limit good fats. I personally am not nearly as low fat as Dean Ornish is. For instance, I eat about 3 or 4 ounces of nuts each day. Ornish is opposed to eating nuts. From what I've read, I have gathered they can be good for the heart. Ornish does see the benefit in Omega 3 fats, however. I do think Ornish is right and Atkins was wrong about saturated fat. Experimental studies do show that saturated fat does impair arterial function. Even Loren Cordain of the Paleo diet said there was harm in Palmitic acid. He also refuted the idea that primitive cultures eat saturated fat and show no signs of heart disease- he clearly stated the Inuit do have hardening of the arteries. Refined carbs, and saturated fats need to be limited. Trans fats should be eliminated. However, exercise does aid the body in countering the ill effects of these things. However Spectra was correct that an active persons needs carbs to fuel their exercise. One should always consume fiber with sugar, but sugar can be consumed right before a person is going to do heavy exercise. One can consume between 10 and 35 percent of calories from fat. I wouldn't go any lower than 10%. The healthy fats just need to be worked into one's calorie budget.
Reply Susan on 31 Dec 2010I honestly believe that Atkins was right about everything. A low-carb diet breaks addictions, lowers cholesterol, results in more weight loss, etc.
Even the new Weight Watchers Points Plus diet has incorporated his findings...more protein, fewer carbs.
People have always bashed Atkins because the media portrayed it as this crazy diet where you ate a pound of bacon in the morning and a dozen eggs. In reality, the diet, sustained over a long period of time, incorporates lots of veggies, some lowcarb fruit, and reasonable amounts of protein.
Reply Dan on 31 Dec 2010Weight Watchers Points Plus program goes directly counter to Atkins in allowing unlimited fruit. This article in the New York Times contrasts Weight Watchers with Gary Taubes (a main spokesperson for Atkins) on the question of fruit. Eating even one or two fruits a day can easily put the person over the 20 gram carbohydrate limit for the day. Look it up in the New York Times on December 28 in the health section.
Reply Add Your Comment Name RequiredEmail Required (never displayed)
URL Remember personal info?
--
. The Paris-based Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), and the European Commission, warn that continual growth in the obesity rate will skyrocket healthcare costs.
worldwide.
should include at least 30 minutes of "moderate-intensity" activity on most days.